Follow Main Street Monroe: Facebook Google+ Twitter

  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Senate Democrats’ War on Women of Faith
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Senate Democrats’ War on Women of Faith

 Post Reply Post Reply
John Beagle View Drop Down
Voice Official
Voice Official

Joined: Nov 21 2000
Location: Monroe, Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 19642
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote John Beagle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Senate Democrats’ War on Women of Faith
    Posted: Sep 07 2017 at 2:34pm

In Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing, female nominee is badgered for her Catholic beliefs

by Katie Nations | Updated 07 Sep 2017 at 2:27 PM

The religious beliefs and convictions of federal appeals court nominee Amy Coney Barrett were not only scrutinized — they were criticized during her confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill yesterday. Barrett, a New Orleans native, is a Notre Dame Law School professor and a self-described faithful Roman Catholic.

The Senate Judiciary Committee questioned Barrett’s ability to carry out her judicial responsibilities based on her past Christian-focused writings and speaking engagements. The left-wing group Alliance for Justice also claimed that “Barrett has asserted that judges should not follow the law or the Constitution when it conflicts with their personal religious beliefs.”

...Catholic judges must uphold the law as their sworn duty to the court and to the country.

However, the article that Barrett co-authored when she was a third-year law student clearly states that Catholic judges must uphold the law as their sworn duty to the court and to the country.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) even went so far during the hearing as to accuse Barrett of a level of fanaticism. Of Barrett's religious suggestion that a Catholic judge must recuse himself or herself in a capital punishment case if the judge morally objects to the death penalty, Feinstein said, "When you read your speeches, the conclusion one draws is that the dogma lives loudly within you. And that's of concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for for years in this country.”

Once again, those on the Left have no tolerance for anyone who dares to disagree with them or hold a view different from their own liberal stances. Feinstein's comments would be completely unacceptable if Barrett were of any religious belief besides Christian. Feinstein's line of questioning came dangerously close to a religious test — one that would question someone's ability to do a certain government job because of the person's religious beliefs.

Imagine the horror and humiliation if conservatives were questioning an atheist nominee in a similar fashion. The fact that a professional woman who has excelled in her legal career faced questioning as if her faith were shameful and an automatic disqualifier for advancement is despicable and intolerant.

America should not be a country that holds disdain for religion or faith — or that disallows individuals who profess certain religious beliefs from holding government office. The constitutional rights that American citizens enjoy begin with the freedom to practice faith — or choose not to do so.

Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who is also a Catholic, claimed Barrett is "outspoken" about her faith and therefore deserves to be thoroughly berated for her public display of religious belief.

Is the legal system really a place where religious intolerance is accepted and encouraged? Should a person feel the need to hide his or her religious convictions in order to achieve career advancement?

Witnessing the questioning and its intolerant nature, Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) said to Barrett, "I think some of the questioning that you have been subjected to today seems to miss some of these fundamental constitutional protections we all have."

Katie Nations, married for 15 years, is a working mother of three young children and is based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. 

The privilege of a lifetime is being who you are.
-Joseph Campbell
Back to Top
Houndog View Drop Down
Voice Council
Voice Council

Joined: Dec 31 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 5404
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (2) Thanks(2)   Quote Houndog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep 07 2017 at 11:01pm
A Roman Catholic once faced the same persecution when running for president. Only at that time it was the religious right that poised question. Who would be running our nation. Said individual? Or the pope?
Back to Top
fiveisalimit View Drop Down
Voice Immigrant
Voice Immigrant

Joined: Aug 16 2017
Location: ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 20
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fiveisalimit Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep 08 2017 at 1:41pm
I was too young to vote or make an informed decision on said Presidential candidate.  I do remember my mother, who was a very devout right wing Christian, sickened by the fact he was elected.  I also remember having but one choice for lunch at my public school on Fridays..... fish.  If you do not agree with the teachings or rules of a religion, pick another one to satisfy your yearning to live forever.  BUT!!!! once the rules of that religion creep into the government (law of the land) you have no choice but to follow THEIR rules or be punished.  That is the true essence of the 1st Amendment.  "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
Seek the
truth. It shall set you free.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

The Voice | Weather | Advertisers | Advertising Information | Lending Library | Monroe Church Directory

Archived Monroe News From: 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011

Website Design © Xponex Web and Media Services | Contact | Terms of Use | Copyright ©2012